Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/DYLN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Stef Lang. As a compromise between the people who see something salvageable but not for this article (the merger-ers) and those who don't see anything worthwhile (the delete-rs) Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

DYLN

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of notability. Sources are all flaky or self-published. TheLongTone (talk) 13:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 15:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not notable, promotional in tone, and the sourcing therein is laughable. Ghits turned up several different individuals/companies with this name. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 15:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Cannot find any secondary media sources on her. No hits, no record deal, no tours, no national TV appearences. Rogermx (talk)
Merge to Stef Lang. Evidently the same person, with DYLN being her "starting over from scratch" ([1]). --Michig (talk) 16:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your research, Michig. I will change from Delete to Merge. This new article was probably her publicist's idea. Rogermx (talk) 16:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Both articles were created by the same editor (Courtneyleed). They're both poorly written and promotional in tone, and Stef Lang isn't proving all that notable either. Sources in both are really bad, as PKT suggested below, that a merge doesn't seem entirely feasible. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 17:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Stef Lang, although the quality of references in DYLN are so poor I don't think much should be carried over. PK T(alk) 16:48, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge. I previously marked this with {{mergeto}} and never got around to it. -- Mikeblas (talk) 23:27, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.